That's not quite fair. Some media outlets are better/worse than others on Israel.
But regardless, you've missed my point. My comment is not about the Times or the BBC's Israel coverage, but about those who continually take satisfaction from "exposing" the NYT's biases on Israel. What's the big deal? It's obvious and well known.
What are they trying to achieve? Change the NYT's coverage? After all these years? Get real.
today's UK Times described the Pal. arrested for kidnapping the British aid worker as a...terrorist. Is it only when Brits are involved that they do that? see http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2006/01/uk-times-uses-terror.html
3 comments:
it everyone really, it's always a good time to bash israel in the media, no excuse or reason needed.
Zion,
That's not quite fair. Some media outlets are better/worse than others on Israel.
But regardless, you've missed my point. My comment is not about the Times or the BBC's Israel coverage, but about those who continually take satisfaction from "exposing" the NYT's biases on Israel. What's the big deal? It's obvious and well known.
What are they trying to achieve? Change the NYT's coverage? After all these years? Get real.
today's UK Times described the Pal. arrested for kidnapping the British aid worker as a...terrorist. Is it only when Brits are involved that they do that? see
http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2006/01/uk-times-uses-terror.html
Post a Comment